Tommy Hough
  • Home
  • About
  • Media
  • On Air
  • 2018 Endorsements
  • Book Tommy
  • Blog
  • Home
  • About
  • Media
  • On Air
  • 2018 Endorsements
  • Book Tommy
  • Blog

Trump Administration Jettisons Environmental Review to Cut Mature Forests in California

9/12/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Healthy, mature forest in the high country of the Los Padres National Forest.
By Mia Taylor with Tommy Hough

The response to the recent San Diego County Democrats for Environmental Action presentation with Los Padres Forest Watchlpfw.org (LPFW) on the proposed Pine Mountain logging project, in which environmental considerations have been largely jettisoned in order to facilitate large-diameter timber cutting under the long-discredited guise of wildfire suppression, electrified our attendees.

The evening's program featured a particularly powerful presentation from LPFW conservation director Bryant Baker, who revealed that logging practices occurring on National Forest lands are often far more environmentally destructive than helpful, with the work being done primarily for the benefit of commercial timber, not the public or the environment. What's more, in the wake of such logging, forests are often left more vulnerable to wildfire than ever. This scenario again played itself out over Labor Day Weekend with the catastrophic wildfires to the north in Oregon.

And in what should come as no surprise, such corrupt, misguided and environmentally devastating practices are occurring more frequently under the Trump administration and their appointees.

While large-scale logging of old-growth and mature forest was largely discontinued on federal land in the Pacific Northwest following the Clinton administration-brokered Northwest Forest Plan in 1994, the four Southern California National Forests (Angeles, Cleveland, Los Padres, San Bernardino) were generally left out of the those science-bounds considerations due to their lack of overwhelming stands of marketable timber. Unfortunately, under Trump, large diameter trees are again being cut en masse by the Forest Service throughout the west, and with the least amount of environmental oversight and review since the "bad old days" of the federal timber-cutting frenzy of the late 1980s.

"We're seeing this a lot. It's only getting more intense under the Trump administration, and it's getting more brazen," Bryant Baker explained.

The Forest Service's current "forest thinning" proposal in the Pine Mountain area in the Los Padres National Forest is just one example of the devastation wrought by increased logging, fueled by the breathless urgency to pointlessly destroy habitat and cut the most mature, fire-resistant trees "before the next wildfire occurs."

At Pine Mountain, the Forest Service is proposing logging and chaparral removal on some 755 acres of land made up of a mixture of old-growth conifer stands of Jeffrey and Coulter pine and ancient White fir. Located near Mount Pinos and the recreation sites of the popular Frazier Park area, Pine Mountain includes a diverse array of Southern California ecosystems in which both healthy and dead trees, called snags, would be cut using heavy equipment ranging from masticators to chainsaws. The agency has made it clear a commercial logging or timber sale is likely.

"The Forest Service has acknowledged they're looking at a commercial timber sale to do this," said Baker. "This is what we're increasingly concerned with on these types of projects. They're really aimed at trying to remove certain size trees that are marketable and can be a source of revenue either for a private company that comes in and does the work, or as a direct timber sale where the Forest Service would sell the timber and keep the money for revenue."

The Forest Service has established a handful of limits for the project with regard to tree cutting at Pine Mountain, based upon tree diameter. The first is it will remove trees less than "24 inches" in diameter. This is intentionally deceptive.
Picture
In other words, the Forest Service will allow, without any questions asked, the removal of any trees that are less than two feet in diameter. In selecting that measurement, the Forest Service is relegating to an old public relations trick of making trees seem smaller than they actually are, and that these removals are inconsequential. That couldn't be further from reality.

Even to a casual observer the 23½ inch tree seen here is hardly small or inconsequential. "This is what the agency is calling a small tree," explained Baker. "We do not believe this is something that can be categorized as a small tree, but the agency is essentially telling the public they're only going to be removing small trees."

What's more, a 24-inch tree, as Baker explained, just happens to be the same size that commercial timber mills welcome. For a timber warrior like club co-founder Tommy Hough, who worked on logging issues with the National Forest Protection Alliance in Seattle in 2001 and as a staff member with Oregon Wild from 2012 to 2014, the similarities to arguments the Forest Service, Bureau of Land Managment (BLM), and Big Timber use to justify logging in the Pacific Northwest are all too familiar.

"The Forest Service still operates on the antiquated 1930s concept of 'multiple use,' and sawmills are still largely equipped to work with large diameter trees," said Tommy. "The timber industry never really bit at the idea of selectively removing smaller-diameter trees out of plantation forests because their mills simply aren't equipped to work with them other than grinding them into mulch."

Picture
The second parameter for the Pine Mountain project is the Forest Service will remove trees up to 64 inches in diameter. Again, the reality of what this means needs to be put in perspective visually for it to be truly understood. The photo here is merely of a 53-inch tree, not even the full 64 inches being proposed.

"The Forest Service is saying it can remove trees up to 64 inches for very vague reasons," said Bryant. "For safety reasons or if the tree is impacted by any dwarf mistletoe. But safety is undefined. They don't really talk about what that means. We've seen this before in other National Forests and other projects and these types of stipulations get abused because they're so vague."

According to Tommy, "Big Timber wants to sell 2 x 4s to China, and both Republican and Democratic administrations typically want to enable that. So they look for reasons to go cut big trees, wherever they may be accessible, even though the older the tree the more fire-resistant it is because of its thicker bark. Go walk in any mature forest and you'll see plenty of burn scars on older trees."

Lastly, the Forest Service will allow trees impacted by dwarf mistletoe to be removed. The devastation of this stipulation truly needs to be put into perspective. Dwarf mistletoe, as Bryant explained, is a native plant species that occurs in these forests naturally. It's an important component of mixed conifer forests made up primarily of Ponderosa and Jeffrey Pine, it serves a vital ecological function, and it increases the volume and diversity of bird species

As it happens, most trees in the Pine Mountain area have some amount of dwarf mistletoe, so when you also include the stipulation that trees with dwarf mistletoe growth can be removed, the Forest Service is allowing the cutting of all trees that are present in the project area – with no substantial limits.

Perhaps the most egregious aspect of these so-called fire suppression projects is the way the Forest Service has been directed to circumvent the typical review process. Using the cover of "categorical exclusion," the Forest Service can proceed on a project without providing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or environmental review.

The before and after images below are of a 
categorical exclusion project in the Plumas National Forest in Lassen County, which was conducted using the same justifications and language as the Pine Mountain project.

Picture
Picture
The first image is an area the Forest Service claimed was too dense. The agency suggested that if a wildfire burned through the area it would destroy the forest and put communities at risk. According to the agency, the removal of "biomass," i.e. living matter, or habitat, was "essential" and would be ecologically "beneficial."

The second photo, which shows the aftermath of such efforts, speaks volumes about the environmental destruction that took place.


"This is not a low impact activity," said Bryant. "This is extremely soil disturbing. This was all done for commercial timber sale. They said this was for forest health and to protect communities. This was a backcountry project that was nowhere near communities and we're seeing this all over California."

Finally, it must be understood that these projects do not aid in wildfire suppression. According to Bryant, "You'll find a lot of non-native grasses in these really disturbed areas, which only make fire more likely and make fire spread more quickly. What we're finding is that often in these really heavily-managed areas where they're doing a lot of this logging under the guise of fire mitigation it may actually be making fires worse."

According to Tommy, "Caifornia does a great deal to protect communities from earthquakes, but we need to approach wildfire and climate change with the same level of science-based seriousness.
"

Given the pressing need for action on this issue, we've provided some immediate resources and further action opportunities.
  • To stay abreast of the of projects occurring within the Cleveland National Forest, you can visit  this U.S. Forest Service website.
  • If you'd like to help support Los Padres Forest Watch and its efforts to protect forests from logging projects, visit their website.
  • You can also e-mail Bryant or Jeff directly for more information. Bryant's e-mail address is bryant@lpfw.org and Jeff's is jeff@lpfw.org.
  • Download and share Bryant's Power Point presentation via PDF file.
  • View the Facebook video from Bryant's Sept. 10th presentation.
  • Visit the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) website for details and information about related projects occurring on state lands.

And while a follow-up workshop comes together, here's a Treehuggers International show Tommy recorded with Rick Halsey of the California Chaparral Institute in 2008. You'll be amazed how the same bad practices are still occurring, and how they do nothing to protect homes from wildfire.
Picture
Areas that appear to be "destroyed" by wildfire still serve as habitat for thousands of species.
Banner photo by Tommy Hough
Photos and graphics courtesy of Bryant Baker and Los Padres Forest Watch

0 Comments
    Picture

    Author

    A former San Diego broadcaster and media personality, Tommy Hough is a wilderness and conservation advocate, communications professional, California Democratic Party delegate, and the co-founder and former president of San Diego County Democrats for Environmental Action. He ran as the endorsed Democratic candidate for San Diego City Council in District 6 in 2018.

    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    October 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    January 2015
    May 2014
    December 2012
    April 2012
    September 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    October 2010
    September 2010
    March 2010
    September 2009
    May 2009
    January 2009
    October 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    April 2007

    Categories

    All
    A16
    A-16
    Adventure 16
    Afoot And Afield
    Afoot And Afield In San Diego County
    Alaska
    Amy Gulick
    Ancient Forest
    Balboa Avenue Station Specific Plan
    Balboa Ave. Transit Station
    Balboa Park
    Bruce Coons
    Cabrillo Bridge
    Donate-a-Pack
    Donate-a-Pack Foundation
    Elsinore Fault
    Fort Tejon
    Fort Tejon Earthquake
    Friends Of Rose Creek
    Jacobs Plan
    Jerry Sanders
    Jerry Schad
    John D. Mead
    Kevin Faulconer
    Long Beach
    Long Beach Earthquake
    Midcoast Trolley Extension
    Mission Bay
    Mission Bay Drive
    Mount Soledad
    National Park Service
    Newport-Inglewood Fault
    Old-growth
    Old-growth Forest
    Organ Pavilion
    Palm Canyon
    Pat Abbott
    Plaza De Panama
    Rose Canyon Fault
    Rose Creek
    Salmon
    Salmon In The Trees
    San Andreas Fault
    San Diego
    San Diego Bay
    San Diego County
    San Diego Trolley
    San Jacinto Fault
    Save Our Heritage Organisation
    Soho
    Southeast-alaska
    Storm-water-division
    Temperate Rainforest
    The Salmon Way
    Tongass National Forest
    Tongass Rainforest
    Wilderness Press

    RSS Feed

Picture
Home   About    Media    Endorsements    Blog
​
Contact    Book Tommy
Copyright © 2007 – 2020 Tommy Hough